<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The Trade Secrets Vault</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13</id>
   <updated>2012-04-29T15:55:34Z</updated>
   <subtitle>A blog of trade secrets news, verdicts, and resources </subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.24-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>AIG Sues Ex-International Lease Executives Over Trade Secrets </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/aig_sues_ex-international_leas.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2264</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-29T15:52:33Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-29T15:55:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Edvard Pettersson American International Group Inc. (AIG) sued the former chief executive officer of its International Lease Finance Corp. aircraft lending business, saying he stole confidential information when he left the company and started Air Lease Corp. (AL) AIG...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By Edvard Pettersson 

American International Group Inc. (AIG) sued the former chief executive officer of its International Lease Finance Corp. aircraft lending business, saying he stole confidential information when he left the company and started Air Lease Corp. (AL)

AIG filed a complaint yesterday in Los Angeles Superior Court accusing Steven Udvar-Hazy and 10 other former International Lease Finance executives of breach of fiduciary duty and stealing trade secrets, among other claims, when they left the company in 2010. AIG seeks to recover "several hundreds of millions" of dollars, according to the complaint.

To finish reading this interesting news article from Bloomberg, please<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-25/air-lease-says-aig-s-trade-secrets-lawsuit-is-baseless-1-.html"> click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Plaintiff must identify trade secrets during discovery, judge rules</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/plaintiff_must_identify_trade.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2265</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-29T15:48:24Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-29T16:00:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Reuters Plaintiffs who claim their trade secrets have been misappropriated must identify what those secrets are during discovery, a New York state judge has ruled. The decision, issued Friday by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich, requires computer software...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[Reuters

Plaintiffs who claim their trade secrets have been misappropriated must identify what those secrets are during discovery, a New York state judge has ruled.

The decision, issued Friday by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich, requires computer software maker MSCI to identify "with reasonable particularity" the trade secrets it alleged former employee Philip Jacob and his new employer, Axioma, misappropriated.

MSCI asserted that Jacob and Axioma misappropriated the source code for risk management software it sells to investment institutions, such as hedge funds and investment banks.

In a previous ruling in November, the judge permitted MSCI to identify solely which portions of its source code were not trade secrets. But Axioma and Jacob's lawyers argued that it was unfair to expect defendants to deduce what trade secrets were at issue, given that the code likely included tens of millions of lines.

To read the complete article by Thomson Reuters, please <a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/New_York/News/2012/04_-_April/Plaintiff_must_identify_trade_secrets_during_discovery,_judge_rules/">click here</a>.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>California fracking bill would protect industry &apos;trade secrets&apos; </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/california_fracking_bill_would.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2263</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-29T15:46:05Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-29T15:48:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A California lawmaker working to pass the Golden State&apos;s first hydraulic fracturing rules has watered down his landmark legislation, hoping to overcome industry opposition to a measure that would force energy companies to disclose the mysterious mix of chemicals they...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[A California lawmaker working to pass the Golden State's first hydraulic fracturing rules has watered down his landmark legislation, hoping to overcome industry opposition to a measure that would force energy companies to disclose the mysterious mix of chemicals they inject into the ground to tap oil deposits.

The legislation stalled last year after objections by industry that full disclosure of "fracking" chemicals would reveal proprietary "recipes." After months of meetings with oil companies and environmentalists, Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski (D-Fremont) is now touting a compromise measure that goes to lengths to protect those trade secrets while increasing public disclosure.

To continue reading this interesting article by LAtimes, please <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2012/04/california-fracking-bill-would-protect-industry-trade-secrets.html<br/><br/>">click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Bridgestone trade secrets case against scientist follows FBI probe</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/bridgestone_trade_secrets_case.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2262</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-14T02:12:45Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-14T03:14:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By Alison Grant, The Plain Dealer A former scientist at Bridgestone Americas Center for Research &amp; Technology in Akron was arrested for stealing trade secrets from the center and giving them to a Chinese polymer maker. Xiaorong Wang, 50, of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By Alison Grant, The Plain Dealer 

  A former scientist at Bridgestone Americas Center for Research & Technology in Akron was arrested for stealing trade secrets from the center and giving them to a Chinese polymer maker.

  Xiaorong Wang, 50, of Hudson, pleaded not guilty Thursday in U.S. District Court in Akron to charges of trade secret theft and making false statements. He was released on $25,000 bond and placed under house arrest and electronic monitoring.  "The truth will eventually come out," Wang said in a brief telephone interview Friday. His attorney, Paul Adamson at Burdon & Merlitti in Akron, could not be reached.

  In order to continue reading this interesting article from Cleveland business, please <a href="http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2012/03/bridgestone_trade_secrets_case.html">click here.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Wis. court upholds PepsiCo trade secrets ruling </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/wis_court_upholds_pepsico_trad.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2261</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-14T01:54:26Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-14T02:11:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By TODD RICHMOND A judge properly vacated a $1.26 billion judgment against PepsiCo Inc. in a lawsuit alleging the soft drink giant stole two Wisconsin men&apos;s idea for bottled water, a state appeals court ruled Thursday. The 4th District Court...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By TODD RICHMOND

A judge properly vacated a $1.26 billion judgment against PepsiCo Inc. in a lawsuit alleging the soft drink giant stole two Wisconsin men's idea for bottled water, a state appeals court ruled Thursday.

The 4th District Court of Appeals ruled the men made their claims too late to satisfy Wisconsin's statute of limitations and should have paid more attention to developments in the beverage industry.

Charles Joyce, of Juneau, and James Voigt, of Cleveland, Wis., filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo and two Wisconsin distributors in 2009. They alleged they met with the distributors' representatives in 1981, and shared their idea for a bottled water product they called Ultra-Pure.

To continue reading this interesting article from BUSINESSWEEK, please <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-03/D9TQ8EQ83.htm">click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Judge Caps Trade Secrets Damages at $5 Million </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/judge_caps_trade_secrets_damag.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2260</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-14T01:48:23Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-14T01:53:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By DAVID LEE Ratier-Figeac, a French manufacturer of aircraft components, must pay $5 million in punitive damages for sharing trade secrets, a Kansas federal judge ruled. Initially U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson had ordered a $9.59 million award, but the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By DAVID LEE 

     Ratier-Figeac, a French manufacturer of aircraft components, must pay $5 million in punitive damages for sharing trade secrets, a Kansas federal judge ruled.

     Initially U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson had ordered a $9.59 million award, but the 10th Circuit threw that decision out because Kansas law caps such awards at $5 million.

     The award stems from claims filed in 2005 by Ice Corp., a Manhattan, Kans.-based aerospace electronics manufacturer. Ice claimed that Ratier-Figeac and Hamilton 
Sundstrand Corp., a subsidiary of technology conglomerate United Technologies Corp., misappropriated trade secrets that were later used in a deicing controller product.

     To uphold the $9.59 million award on remand, Robinson would have had to find that Ratier-Figeac enjoyed more than $5 million in profits from its misconduct.
     Ice, however, failed to demonstrate such profits.

In order to continue reading this interesting article by Courthouse News, please <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/09/45448.htm">click here.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Stealing Trade Secrets Is Not Hacking </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/04/stealing_trade_secrets_is_not.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2259</id>
   
   <published>2012-04-14T01:43:50Z</published>
   <updated>2012-04-14T01:47:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By TIM HULL Refusing to broaden its interpretation of a federal anti-hacking law, the full 9th Circuit on Tuesday affirmed dismissal of several charges against a corporate headhunter who allegedly relied on his former employer&apos;s confidential information. A majority of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By TIM HULL 

Refusing to broaden its interpretation of a federal anti-hacking law, the full 9th Circuit on Tuesday affirmed dismissal of several charges against a corporate headhunter who allegedly relied on his former employer's confidential information.

     A majority of the 11-judge court rejected the government's more expansive reading of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), finding that the statute was meant to punish hacking, not misappropriation of trade secrets. To find otherwise would "criminalize any unauthorized use of information obtained from a computer" and "make criminals of large groups of people who would have little reason to suspect they are committing a federal crime," according to the lead opinion authored by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski.

In order to continue reading this interesting article by Courthouse News Service, please <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/10/45497.htm<br/><br/>">click here</a>.  ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Role of Social Media in Workplace Disputes</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/03/the_role_of_social_media_in_wo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2258</id>
   
   <published>2012-03-20T21:00:48Z</published>
   <updated>2012-03-20T21:19:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By: Elise Bloom and John Barry As employment disputes commonly involve communications between or among employees, management, and customers, it should come as no surprise that social media&apos;s role in workplace disputes has drastically increased in the last year. Indeed,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By: Elise Bloom and John Barry

As employment disputes commonly involve communications between or among employees, management, and customers, it should come as no surprise that social media's role in workplace disputes has drastically increased in the last year. Indeed, recent decisions from around the country have turned on the application of Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, and blogging.

This article discusses recent social media cases in the context of post-employment obligations and makes recommendations for what employers can do to better protect confidential information and trade secrets.

In PhoneDog v. Kravitz, an employer sued a former employee claiming that its 17,000 Twitter followers remained company property after the employment relationship ended. PhoneDog had hired Noah Kravitz to write product reviews and post and link blog entries in the hopes of driving traffic to the PhoneDog website, thereby generating advertising revenues.

To finish reading this interesting article from <em>Corporate Counsel</em>, please <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202546320984&The_Role_of_Social_Media_in_Workplace_Disputes">click here.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Court Blocks Sales of Botox Alternative</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/03/court_blocks_sales_of_botox_al.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2257</id>
   
   <published>2012-03-20T20:54:54Z</published>
   <updated>2012-03-20T21:00:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By: ANJALI ATHAVALEY A U.S. district court issued a 10-month injunction against a maker of a Botox alternative that was accused of misappropriating trade secrets belonging to Allergan Inc. AGN -0.14% The injunction, issued by the U.S. district court for...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By: ANJALI ATHAVALEY

A U.S. district court issued a 10-month injunction against a maker of a Botox alternative that was accused of misappropriating trade secrets belonging to Allergan Inc. AGN -0.14%

The injunction, issued by the U.S. district court for the Central District of California, is a win for Botox owner, Allergan, and deals a blow to closely held Merz Group because it prohibits two units of the German company from selling the rival Xeomin drug for cosmetic use in the U.S. for 10 months. Like Botox, Xeomin was marketed for cosmetic and therapeutic reasons.

"The reputational damage and inconvenience to physicians [and] patients will make Xeomin relaunch a challenge," said Larry Biegelsen, an analyst at Wells Fargo WFC +0.20% . He added that the injunction wasn't unexpected, but its duration and scope had been uncertain. The injunction order also restricts Merz from selling the drug for therapeutic use to physicians in certain areas.

To read this interesting article from the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, please <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304450004577277604046678424.html">click here.</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Duke faces sharp questions on secret documents</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/03/duke_faces_sharp_questions_on.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2256</id>
   
   <published>2012-03-09T15:19:16Z</published>
   <updated>2012-03-09T15:22:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By: John Russell Duke Energy Corp. found itself on the defensive Tuesday, as Indiana utility regulators demanded to know why hundreds of documents on the company&apos;s troubled Edwardsport power plant should be kept under seal. The utility spent hours making...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By: John Russell 

Duke Energy Corp. found itself on the defensive Tuesday, as Indiana utility regulators demanded to know why hundreds of documents on the company's troubled Edwardsport power plant should be kept under seal.

The utility spent hours making the case that the documents contained sensitive financial and technology information, and should be considered trade secrets under Indiana law.

The massive coal-gasification plant has run into numerous engineering and construction problems, pushing the price from $1.985 billion to $3.3 billion.

To continue reading this interesting article by Indy Star -Bizz Buzz-, please <a href="http://blogs.indystar.com/bizbuzz/2012/03/06/duke-faces-sharp-questions-on-secret-documents/">click here</a>.
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Former DuPont Worker Pleads Guilty in Economic Espionage Case</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/03/former_dupont_worker_pleads_gu.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2255</id>
   
   <published>2012-03-09T15:14:08Z</published>
   <updated>2012-03-09T15:17:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By: Karen Gullo Former DuPont Co. (DD) employee Tze Chao pleaded guilty to conspiring to steal trade secrets about titanium dioxide technology from the company and provide them to China&apos;s state-owned Pangang Group Co. (000629) Chao, 77, a naturalized U.S....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By: Karen Gullo

Former DuPont Co. (DD) employee Tze Chao pleaded guilty to conspiring to steal trade secrets about titanium dioxide technology from the company and provide them to China's state-owned Pangang Group Co. (000629)

Chao, 77, a naturalized U.S. citizen who spent 35 years at DuPont, said he used his former employer's trade secrets to help Pangang, which was building a 100,000 metric-ton-per-year plant to produce titanium dioxide, a white pigment used in paints, plastics and paper. He entered his plea yesterday in federal court in San Francisco, admitting to one count of conspiracy to commit economic espionage.

To continue reading this interesting article from <em>Bloomberg</em>, please <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-02/former-dupont-worker-pleads-guilty-in-trade-secrets-case.html">click here</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Trade Secrets Act keeps pepper spray ingredients &apos;secret&apos;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/02/trade_secrets_act_keeps_pepper.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2254</id>
   
   <published>2012-02-10T22:10:52Z</published>
   <updated>2012-02-10T22:15:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>FORT MYERS, Fla. - Law enforcement officers rave about pepper spray as a way to get compliance without drawing their guns. In recent weeks we&apos;ve seen it gain scrutiny as law enforcement uses it as a way to control crowds...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[FORT MYERS, Fla. - Law enforcement officers rave about pepper spray as a way to get compliance without drawing their guns. In recent weeks we've seen it gain scrutiny as law enforcement uses it as a way to control crowds at occupy events. But if you think it's natural and made of peppers, you're only about two-percent right. In fact, some ingredients in pepper spray are a highly guarded trade secret.

There are many more chemicals in a pepper spray canister than just the active ingredient pepper. Though companies may list some chemicals, others are not listed because they are considered a trade secret and legally protected under federal law.

To read the complete article by Wink news, please <a href="http://www.winknews.com/Local-Florida/2012-02-06/Trade-Secrets-Act-keeps-pepper-spray-ingredients-secret-">click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>UPDATE 3-Ericsson sued for $330 mln in trade secrets case</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/02/update_3-ericsson_sued_for_330.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2253</id>
   
   <published>2012-02-10T22:03:11Z</published>
   <updated>2012-02-10T22:10:42Z</updated>
   
   <summary>By: Jonathan Stempel Ericsson, the world&apos;s largest telecommunications network equipment maker, has been sued for more than $330 million by a Massachusetts broadband network company that accused it of stealing trade secrets and trying to drive it out of business....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[By: Jonathan Stempel

Ericsson, the world's largest telecommunications network equipment maker, has been sued for more than $330 million by a Massachusetts broadband network company that accused it of stealing trade secrets and trying to drive it out of business.

Airvana Network Solutions Inc, founded in 2000 by former Motorola Inc executives, said Ericsson secretly joined with a Korean partner to develop "knock-off" hardware based on Airvana technology, and which could then be sold to wireless carriers Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel Corp.

The case is Airvana Network Solutions Inc v. Ericsson Inc et al, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No. 650360/2012.

To finish reading this interesting article featured by Reuters, please click here<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/08/ericsson-airvana-idUSL2E8D87Y620120208"></a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>When is a Trade Secret Not a Trade Secret? When it is Revealed at a European Parliament Exhibition</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/01/when_is_a_trade_secret_not_a_t.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2252</id>
   
   <published>2012-01-27T23:52:29Z</published>
   <updated>2012-01-27T23:58:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>PRNewswire via COMTEX For the first time ever, a full fragrance formula will be published and given out to visitors along with the fragrance at an exhibition in the European Parliament from January 31st to February 2nd 2012. This will...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[PRNewswire via COMTEX

For the first time ever, a full fragrance formula will be published and given out to visitors along with the fragrance at an exhibition in the European Parliament from January 31st to February 2nd 2012.

This will be a unique opportunity to actually contemplate a genuine full fragrance formula. Formulae have traditionally been a closely guarded secret and are an important piece of intellectual property for the fragrance industry.

Incentives to innovate, particularly within the European Union, have been weakened not only by piracy in Asia and other rapidly developing economies, but also by inconsistent trade secret protection offered by EU Member States' legislation in this area.

To finish reading this interesting news article from <em>Marketwatch</em>, please <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/when-is-a-trade-secret-not-a-trade-secret-when-it-is-revealed-at-a-european-parliament-exhibition-2012-01-24">click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>NCsoft alleges trade secret theft, seeks to block Tera&apos;s U.S. release </title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/2012/01/ncsoft_alleges_trade_secret_th.html" />
   <id>tag:www.tradesecretsblog.info,2012://13.2251</id>
   
   <published>2012-01-27T23:05:12Z</published>
   <updated>2012-01-27T23:52:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In 2009, the former employees were convicted of stealing NCsoft trade secrets following a lawsuit in Korea. In 2010, they were barred from using proprietary NCsoft information, and ordered to pay damages to their former employer, although the damages ruling...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alice Cabrera</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tradesecretsblog.info/">
      <![CDATA[In 2009, the former employees were convicted of stealing NCsoft trade secrets following a lawsuit in Korea. In 2010, they were barred from using proprietary NCsoft information, and ordered to pay damages to their former employer, although the damages ruling was overturned during the appeals process. Bluehole employees are appealing the other rulings.

Despite the legal proceedings, Tera launched in Korea last year, and is slated for a U.S. release in May. NCsoft's suit seeks damages and temporary and permanent injunctions to block the release of Tera in the U.S.

In order to read the complete article from Gamasutra, please <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39857/NCsoft_alleges_trade_secret_theft_seeks_to_block_Teras_US_release.php">click here</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

