« International Rectifier sues former CEO for theft of trade secrets | Main | Alabama judge upholds $192M verdict in property suit »

How Juror Misconceptions Affect Patent Trials

By: Joe Mullin
IP Law & Business

Lawyers know that copying doesn't need to be present to prove patent infringement. Independent invention is not a defense to an allegation of infringement, and patent law stands alone, legally speaking, in that it actually punishes independent development. Other areas of intellectual property law, including copyright, trademark and trade secrets, all require proof of actual copying to hold a defendant liable.

But patent trials get played out on an emotional playing field, as well as a legal and technical one. Veteran trial lawyers and jury consultants say that most Americans think that infringement means inventors claiming they've been copied, their ideas "ripped off" or stolen. "Jurors will almost always talk about copying," says jury consultant Doug Green, even when copying has not been alleged.

To continue reading this interesting article from law.com, click here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 25, 2009 8:03 PM.

The previous post in this blog was International Rectifier sues former CEO for theft of trade secrets.

The next post in this blog is Alabama judge upholds $192M verdict in property suit .

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.