« Privilege-Wise and Patent (and Trade Secret)-Foolish?: How the Courts' Misapplication of the Military and State Secrets Privilege Violates the Constitution and Endangers National Security | Main | ND Ill - Party could not assert a trademark right in idea for name. »

This case requires us to construe an exclusion barring coverage for "any claim arising out of any misappropriation of trade secret" in a professional liability policy

This case requires us to construe an exclusion barring coverage for "any claim
arising out of any misappropriation of trade secret" in a professional liability
policy issued by the defendant, National Union Fire Insurance Company of
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (National Union), to the plaintiff, Uniscribe
Professional Services, Inc. (Uniscribe). After settling a claim with a client from
whom sensitive documents were taken while in Uniscribe's care, Uniscribe commenced
an action seeking a declaratory judgment that National Union had a duty to defend
and indemnify Uniscribe for the settlement. National Union moved for
judgment on the pleadings, see Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(c), 365 Mass. 754 (1974),
arguing that its policy excluded claims arising out of the misappropriation of
trade secrets (intellectual property exclusion), wrongful acts committed with the
knowledge that it was a wrongful act (knowing wrongful acts exclusion) and
criminal acts (criminal acts exclusion). Uniscribe opposed National Union's motion
and moved for partial summary judgment

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts,

Suffolk.

Joseph F. FINN, Jr., assignee, [FN1]

v.

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, & another.

[FN2]

SJC-10153

October 8, 2008.

December 2, 2008.


Contract, Insurance. Insurance, Coverage, Construction of policy, Intellectual
property exclusion. Trade Secret.


CIVIL ACTION commenced in the Superior Court Department on July 1, 2005.


The case was heard by Geraldine S. Hines, J., on motions for judgment on the
pleadings and for partial summary judgment.


The Supreme Judicial Court granted an application for direct appellate review.


Steven L. Schreckinger (Jane M. Guevremont with him) for the plaintiff.


John D. Hughes for the defendants.


Present: Marshall, C.J., Greaney, Ireland, Spina, Cordy, & Botsford, JJ.


SPINA, J.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 26, 2008 12:04 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Privilege-Wise and Patent (and Trade Secret)-Foolish?: How the Courts' Misapplication of the Military and State Secrets Privilege Violates the Constitution and Endangers National Security .

The next post in this blog is ND Ill - Party could not assert a trademark right in idea for name..

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.