« Court of Appeals of South Carolina: POWER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES COMPANY, INC. v. Robert A. KOZMA at al | Main | CONCERN OVER PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS, AVOIDING FRAUD LEADS FIRMS TO HIRE PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS TO ASSIST THEM »

6th Cir - Reasonableness of efforts was a question for trier of fact.

Niemi v. NHK Spring Co., Ltd. (9/19/08)

The trial court dismissed the claims against Spring, the parent corporation of New Mather Metals, Inc. ("NMM"), for lack of personal jurisdiction and awarded summary judgment to NMM on all of Niemi's claims. The 6th Circuit upheld the trial court's dismissal of the claims against Spring, but held that there was sufficient evidence to create fact issues on the trade secret and promissory estoppel claims. Given that Niemi's averment of an oral confidentiality agreement was probative evidence and not refuted, the experts' opinions afforded facially significant evidence of the reasonableness of Niemi's reliance on such an agreement. When Niemi's statement was viewed in light of customary practice and the parties' lengthy relationship, a fact issue began to emerge. A jury could find that Niemi's efforts to maintain the confidentiality of his trade secret were reasonable.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 28, 2008 9:56 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Court of Appeals of South Carolina: POWER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES COMPANY, INC. v. Robert A. KOZMA at al.

The next post in this blog is CONCERN OVER PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS, AVOIDING FRAUD LEADS FIRMS TO HIRE PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS TO ASSIST THEM.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.