« EX-HP EXEC WON'T CONTEST TRADE-SECRET THEFT CHARGES | Main | SILICON VALLEY ENGINEER SENTENCED FOR ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE »

D. Ma : court would not award double or treble damages against defendants for their

Background: Complaint and counterclaim were filed relating to the control of a
small Spanish-language bi-weekly newspaper. After defendants withdrew from
litigation and agreed to turn over entire control of paper to plaintiffs, jury
returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs.


Holdings: The District Court, Ponsor, J., held that:

(1) court would not enhance jury award for violation of Lanham Act provision
prohibiting, inter alia, false designation of origin;

(2) court would not award double or treble damages against defendants for their
violation of Massachusetts law regarding the taking of trade secrets; and

(3) court would not treble damages against defendants for infringement of a
federally registered trademark.

So ordered.

549 F.Supp.2d 131

United States District Court,
D. Massachusetts.

DILOGO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs

v.

Lillian Santiago BAUZ, et al., Defendants.

No. 05-cv-30076-MAP.

April 30, 2008.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 4, 2008 12:39 AM.

The previous post in this blog was EX-HP EXEC WON'T CONTEST TRADE-SECRET THEFT CHARGES.

The next post in this blog is SILICON VALLEY ENGINEER SENTENCED FOR ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.